Something happened in class on Thursday that I have never experienced—an ethnic conflict of vast proportions was brought to real life for me. I take a class about politics in the Middle East and we were covering an especially sensitive topic: the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. A freshman in the class raised his hand and asked (I paraphrase throughout the narrative) “If Palestine isn’t even a real country, why are they so nationalistic?” At the time he asked the question, I felt bad for him. He had certainly never covered this all-too-current conflict and was perhaps a bit naive about the events and political situation in the Middle East. Some of the other students in the class began laughing at his stupidity (I write this with obvious opinion-orientated language), but, sadly, one of the Palestinian students in the class was not so happy about the way he phrased his question or the tone of it.
He mouthed off at the other student saying “You have no right to ask that f---ing question. F--- you.” Then the other student responded with more foul language and it became a situation in which the teacher was screaming at them to both “stop-it” and “calm down!” Other students got involved, not taking sides, with “you guys, stop!” These altercations went on for what seemed like a very long 20 seconds. Many of the other students in the class, including myself, looked down at their feet. What right do I have to bud in or say one party was right or wrong? I did feel incredibly bad for the teacher.
Before I continue this narrative, I actually have another of the same theme. Sophomore year I took a class about communication and culture and we had a set of speakers talking about immigration and how both immigrants and the United States use very specific communication mediums. A female student, probably of the upper middle-class conservative upbringing, said so thoughtfully, “I think the only reason that illegal immigrants don’t get citizenship is because they don’t want to pay taxes.” Well, even the Latino guest, a professor in Annenberg, was blatantly offended by her comment, not to mention many of the Latinos in the class. To be honest, I was even tempted to contribute to the ensued ruckus because I am from San Diego (20 minutes from Tijuana), and I sympathize with many of the illegal immigrants in my own neighborhood. She deserved her freedom of speech, but so did all the other students that began verbally attacking her, some personally attacking her—I definitely heard “Where did you grow up, Newport?”
So I state that everyone is entitled to free speech, especially in America. But while I was abroad, it was often very difficult to stick to my conviction in a class where we had a discussion about 9/11. It was a class with many international students—England, USA, the Netherlands, Canada, Germany, Australia and Poland were all represented. Well the teacher, who is of German descent, points the class discussion along the lines of comparing Osama Bin Laden to George Bush. Immediately the Americans in the class—there were six of us—were alienated from the conversation. An Australian student who had earlier made her opinions about not only America but every single American citizen very clear, stated (and this is actually a direct quote), “Well, I’m sorry to say, but you guys deserved it.” She said this grotesque statement and looked at the six of us. One of the Americans in the class was from New York and knew many people who died in the 9/11 attack. He began to get teary-eyed as he attempted to defend centuries of poor policy decisions made by the American government. What could we say?
However, a clear line needs to be drawn here. Everyone is entitled to an opinion, but the young man from my Middle East class who asked the question was not directly stating an opinion. At the time he asked the question, I believe, however naive, that he was just trying to learn. He may be from an upbringing where the do not talk about world politics at the dinner table. I consider myself so naïve about many international situations. (What is going on in Venezuela?) I want to ask the Palestinian supporter whether or not he is from the Middle East because he does have a slight accent, but I am terrified of getting a hostile response. The anger he showed in class crushed any opportunity for many of the students to learn or to explore a controversial topic. Although thrilling for a Thursday late-afternoon class, I was sad the violent altercation happened. How great would it have been to here the Palestinian student’s response to the question? I for one would have been glued to every word, which disappoints me. There is so much violence, ethnic and international tension that even at a place of higher learning, opportunities to be educated become diluted.
Update: This weekend I encountered someone from my Middle East class who told me that the freshman who asked the question was a very outspoken Israeli supporter and activist. He supposedly meant the question to be hostile and serve as an attack of Palestinian interest. I can’t confirm this or decide if it changes my opinion.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
If he is an Israeli supporter, I don't think it changes the fact that the outbursts were rude from both sides. It was completely disrespectful to the professor who is very nice. I understand that often offensive comments are made. During the immigration debate I heard many, but it will in no way help anyone's cause to react that way. I would have also liked to hear why as a Palestinian he believed they had a right to be nationalistic. It is saddening that the discussion turned that way and I feel the professor lost respect for both students. I just hope he didn't lose hope in the rest of us.
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed your stories. Thanks for sharing. Your stories about the US really resonated with me because I went to Singapore for an Asia-Pacific conference and I encountered something similar especially among the participants of the "Western" countries like New Zealand and Australia. But it was more done in humor and I wasn't afraid to bring up the issues of US' problematic unilateralism myself.
ReplyDeleteIn either case, I think you're right. There is something to be said that with rights come responsibilities. Just because you have the right to the freedom of speech, does not mean you cannot be responsible in your speech- responsibilities of respect and empathy. Instead of blurting out comments about immigration, if one utilized more empathy, one might be able to guess that phrasing the comment in a way of supposed authority could be politically and emotionally insensitive.
Indeed, one of the drawbacks of much of our suburban high school education system is a gaping absence in most discussions of privilege in all its forms.
It's sad to think that debate could so easily disrupt the learning process, but learning how to approach these difficult issues with compassion and respect is the only way we can ever hope to many any kind of progress. What happened in the safe microcosm of your classroom is representative of conflicts that are happening around the world when people let their anger and hatred overtake any rationality, ruining any chance of reaching peace.
ReplyDeleteI agree with the above comment that even though we do promote free speech, people at the same time should be responsible for what they say and exercise discretion. I feel it's distorting the purpose of free speech if you use it only to hurt and spread animosity.
I absolutely agree that people should exercise responsibility with free speech, however at the same time, how are these people (the guy who asked about nationalism and the girl who asked about illegal immigrants) going to learn to be politically correct and not arrogant, if they keep these questions to themselves and discuss in the classroom with other students and teachers?
ReplyDelete